Back in the day: The Killers, 1946 or 1964?

Friday, May 21, 2010 2:17 PM By Simon

Back in January, before I had any readers that were not traffic from my sista's page, I wrote a thing on one of my favorite movies, The Killers. Here, I contrast that one with the 1964 remake. Here it is, for your reading, my lovelies.




For those of you who don't know, The Killers originated as a short story by Ernest Hemingway back when he was doing those sorts of things. It was about two men who came to town, to kill a Swedish boxer hiding out there. Their reasons aren't specified, but it is assumed that it has something to do with the boxer's refusal to throw a fight. At the time, it was most notable for featuring Nick Adams, a regular character in Hemingway's stories, who enters into his teen years here.

It was adapted several times. The first was feature length and starring Burt Lancaster and Ava Gardner, in her breakout role. The second, a short student film by Andrei Tarkovsky, later a renowned Soviet director of such films as the original Solaris. The third was originally intended to be the first made-for-TV movie, but released in theatres because of the violence, stars John Cassavetes (Rosemarry's husband in Rosemary's Baby , and a pioneer in independent cinema), Lee Marvin, and Angie Dickinson.

Alright, enough history. I'm not weighing in on Tarkovsky's version (here), or any of the other short films made in the past two decades based on this story. Just the two features.

PROS AND CONS

1946


STORY: The same as the story up until the death of one "Swede" Anderson, with a Shady Past and a Dark Secret, wherein an investigator for an insurance company investigates the circumstances of his death, and discovers an intricate plot of robbery and betrayel, involving mastermind Colfax (Albert Dekker) and mysterious love of the Dead and Deceased, Kitty (Gardner).

PROS:
Ava Gardner and Burt Lancaster. A suspenseful opening scene in the diner the Swede frequents, followed by the iconic frame of Anderson before his death. Good acting from the supporting cast. Black-and-white. A cold, classic-noir atmosphere. Engaging plot, well paced, etc. Soundtrack. Broad-chested policemen chomping cigars and calling everybody 'pal' and 'buddy'.

CONS:
Slow, drags on.

1964:


PLOT: Basically, it's the same, except now the boxer is a racecar driver named Johnny North, now a teacher at a school for the blind. Two hitmen, played by Lee Marvin and Clu Gulager, come in, rough up the secretary of the school and some blind guys (Damn. It.), before storming the class North is teaching. Instead of running or begging for his life, he simply moves away from his students to take the shots. Later, on a train going An-y-where, Charlie, the older and more experienced of the duo, is bothered by Johnny's impassiveness, and he convinces his partner to help him track down those who knew him, and find out why.

PROS:
John Cassavetes. The slow, melodramatic, but brutal violence that the sixties and seventies produced, before all the choreographed PG-13 shit of the eighties kicked in. Higher paced than original. Lee Marvin being badass.

CONS:
Angie Dickinson (I'm not saying she's bad in general, just in this), off-kilter plot, Adaption Distillation, the throttling of blind people (I'm no moral trumpet or anything, but Christ), meh acting.

Oh, and a supporting role by a certain guy who once had a very important job, an economic system named after him, and an extremely specific fanbase. Give up? Why not take a closer look at the pciture of the dude pimp-slapping Ava Gardner up above.

Yeah.

18 comments:

SugaryCynic said...

heh, pre-presidential pimp slap

May 21, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Stacia said...

I often compare these 2 movies, too. I think I like the 1946 best, mainly because: (1) The opening scene of the 1946 version with William "They all come here and eat the big dinner" Conrad is marvelous, and (2) the bluescreen behind Angie and John when they're in the go carts in the 1964 version is so bad it's gone past Funnytown and way into the state of Pathetichusetts.

May 21, 2010 at 7:41 PM
Andy from fandango groovers said...

1946 version for me every time, the remake is a mess with wooden acting .

May 22, 2010 at 2:32 PM
Thomas said...

I prefer the remake because... well, it has Lee Marvin in it and that´s all I ask for. I may be shallow. The jury´s still out on that one. I always liked the final scene in the remake, I thought it packed more of a punch than the oiriginal.

May 23, 2010 at 4:31 AM
Anonymous said...

Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a
amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from
you! However, how can we communicate?

my webpage :: vacation for kids in california

March 20, 2013 at 5:37 PM
Anonymous said...

Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on.
Any tips?

Here is my homepage vertical Jump programs

April 8, 2013 at 7:52 AM
Anonymous said...

Informative article, totally what I wanted to find.


Here is my weblog ... bed head manipulator

April 8, 2013 at 9:43 PM
Anonymous said...

Thanks for a marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you're a great author. I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and may come back later on. I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great writing, have a nice afternoon!

My blog post; workouts to improve vertical leap

April 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM
Anonymous said...

Appreciate this post. Will try it out.

Also visit my site - vertical jump workouts

April 26, 2013 at 2:24 AM
Anonymous said...

I used to be able to find good information from your blog posts.


Here is my weblog http://fandomaccess.com/JeffereyB

April 29, 2013 at 9:45 AM
Anonymous said...

Every weekend i used to go to see this website, for the reason
that i wish for enjoyment, since this this web site conations actually pleasant funny data
too.

My web page; bed guard rail

May 2, 2013 at 3:40 AM
Anonymous said...

We're a bunch of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with useful information to work on. You have done an impressive activity and our entire community will likely be thankful to you.

My web site; www.emediastudios.tv

May 6, 2013 at 2:00 AM
Anonymous said...

With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of
plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of exclusive content I've either written myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any techniques to help stop content from being stolen? I'd really
appreciate it.

my website; Dwi Lawyer dallas

May 10, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Anonymous said...

You should be a part of a contest for one of the most
useful blogs on the internet. I most certainly will
recommend this web site!

Feel free to visit my page: how to jump higher fast

May 10, 2013 at 6:04 PM
Anonymous said...

I need to to thank you for this very good read!! I certainly loved every little bit of it.
I have you book-marked to look at new stuff you
post…

Stop by my homepage travelex

May 17, 2013 at 12:18 AM
Anonymous said...

It's a shame you don't have a donate button! I'd definitely donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i'll settle for book-marking and
adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this site with my Facebook
group. Talk soon!

Here is my webpage ... vertical jump exercises

May 17, 2013 at 6:26 AM
Anonymous said...

I constantly spent my half an hour to read this website's articles or reviews all the time along with a cup of coffee.

Also visit my site vertical leap workouts

May 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Anonymous said...

What's up to every body, it's my first pay a visit of this web site; this webpage
consists of remarkable and genuinely fine information for visitors.



Feel free to visit my homepage :: workouts to improve vertical

May 19, 2013 at 6:59 PM